An exploration of the SQL,MySQL,PostgreSQL, and NoSQL database options and discussion on where and when to use them.
Written by
J Edwards
Published on
July 25, 2023
Databases can be a pretty confusing subject. With all the different acronyms and the alphabet soup that is databases, it's not always easy to know what language or database system is best suited for your project. Even experienced developers can get overwhelmed.
This blog post provides a straightforward explanation of SQL, MySQL, PostgreSQL, and NoSQL, and delves into the features and use cases for each. In this blog we will address the questions:
Let's start by diving right into the root of it all - SQL
SQL, or Structured Query Language, is really the go-to tool for anyone digging into data. SQL provides a standardized way to interact with databases and perform operations such as querying, inserting, updating, deleting, and indexing data. While it can be used for relational databases and some non-relational databases, it offers way more advantages when working with relational databases.
Let's take a moment to look at an example of SQL in action...
When working with a database, you need to first connect to it using a database tool or language. Once connected, you can use SQL queries to perform various tasks on the data via the database management system (DBMS), which parses the SQL query to understand its structure and intent.
In relational databases, where SQL is usually used, data is stored in tables made up of rows and columns; each row represents a single record of data. For example, a table of products might have columns for the product name, price, and description.
If you want to retrieve information from the table of products, you can use a SQL SELECT
statement. Using the example table mentioned above, with columns for the product name, price, and description, you can use the following SQL query to retrieve the information:
SELECT product_name, price, description
FROM products;
This query selects the columns product_name
, price
, and description
from the products
table. It retrieves all the records (rows) in the table.
If you want to take it a step further and filter the results based on specific criteria, you can use the WHERE clause in SQL. For example, to retrieve only the products with a price less than 100, you can modify the query to reflect the following:
SELECT product_name, price, description
FROM products
WHERE price < 100;
This query will return the product name, price, and description for all products whose price is less than 100.
All in all, SQL is not tied to any specific database system but instead acts as a universal language that can be used with different database management systems (DBMS), such as MySQL and PostgreSQL (to name a few). This means that once you learn SQL, you can apply your knowledge to work with a variety of databases.
The thing is - though learning SQL basics can be relatively straightforward, there are different flavors, dialects, and versions of SQL out there, and it can be easy to get lost in the sauce.
SQL and NoSQL are two different approaches to data management, each with its own strengths and drawbacks. Like we mentioned above, SQL is not just any language; it's a specialized programming language designed specifically for managing and manipulating data in relational database management systems (RDBMS).
While SQL is fantastic for structured data, NoSQL (short for “not only SQL” or “non-SQL”) takes a more flexible approach to data management. NoSQL is not a language itself, but instead refers to a category of database management systems that share common characteristics. NoSQL databases break away from the traditional SQL approach and offer an alternative way to handle data that comes in different flavors - from document-oriented, key-value, columnar, and graph databases.
NoSQL databases, like MongoDB, Redis, DynamoDB, and Cassandra, usually have their own special query languages or APIs tailored to their data models and capabilities.
Since NoSQL is great for unstructured or semi-structured data, it can handle data like documents, key-value pairs, graphs, and time-series data. However, with this flexibility comes some trade-offs. NoSQL databases usually can’t provide the same level of transactional guarantees or complex querying capabilities as traditional SQL databases.
Let’s break things down a little more and look into the terms mentioned above as well as the good (and the bad) of a couple databases out there. You can also skip ahead if you just want a quick summary.
At the start of this post, we highlighted SQL, NoSQL, PostgreSQL, and MySQL. Now, let's delve into their details.
SQL databases, such as MySQL and PostgreSQL work well with data that follows a strict and organized structure. Officially pronounced as "ess-que-el", but sometimes referred to as "sequel," SQL was developed in the 1970s at IBM with the aim of creating a standardized language for dealing with RDMS. It’s great at ensuring data integrity, handling complex relationships, and delivering excellent performance. So, when you're dealing with data that needs a well-defined framework, SQL is definitely helpful.
Benefits of SQL:
Drawbacks of SQL:
Here are a few cases of when to choose SQL:
MySQL is a widely-used open-source relational DBMS that uses the SQL language for querying. Initially developed in 1979 as UNIREG, MySQL was later acquired by Sun Microsystems in 2008 and then Oracle in 2010. Many popular applications use it because it’s agile, straightforward, easy to set up, and has been around for a while.
MySQL is known for its simplicity and user-friendly design, which makes it accessible for many. However, while it may be an easy-to-use option for some projects or basic applications, more complex or enterprise-level systems may require a more feature-rich solution.
Benefits of MySQL:
Drawbacks of MySQL:
Here are a few cases of when to choose MySQL:
PostgreSQL (also known as Postgres) is like that reliable friend who never lets you down, no matter what. It's an open-source RDBMS that provides advanced features like support for complex queries, full-text search, and even geographical data. While MySQL is purely relational, Postgres is an object-relational database that offers more complex data types, object inheritance, and is easy to work with.
Initially developed as POSTGRES in 1986, it evolved from the INGRES project and was released as PostgreSQL in 1996. For decades Postgres has cultivated a dynamic community. While it may not be as widely used as MySQL, it’s steadily moving up the ladder in popularity and application. Its active and vibrant community is growing (as seen in the graph above) - fostering knowledge sharing, support, and collaborative efforts. More users are discovering the benefits and potential of Postgres.
Benefits of PostgreSQL:
Drawbacks of PostgreSQL:
Here are a few cases of when to choose PostgreSQL:
NoSQL, as the name suggests, stands for "Not Only SQL." NoSQL refers to databases that are not based solely on the traditional SQL relational model. These databases are designed to handle unstructured or evolving data.
The history of NoSQL dates back to the early 2000s when companies like Google, Amazon, and Facebook faced challenges in scaling their data infrastructure. The rise of NoSQL databases was a response to some of the limitations of traditional SQL databases in dealing with increasing volume and velocity. However, SQL databases, such as Postgres, have also evolved and come a long way since then.
Benefits of NoSQL:
Drawbacks of NoSQL:
Here are a few cases of when to choose NoSQL:
TL;DR Here's a concise table which outlines the main points of comparison among SQL, MySQL, PostgreSQL, and NoSQL.
Descriptor | SQL | MySQL | PostgreSQL | NoSQL |
---|---|---|---|---|
Overview | A language used to manage and manipulate structured data in relational databases. | An open-source RDBMS that uses SQL as its query language. | An advanced open-source RDBMS that uses SQL as its query language. | A category of databases that diverge from the traditional SQL and relational database model, designed to handle unstructured or evolving data. |
History | Initially developed in 1979 | Developed in 1979; released in 1995 | Developed in 1986; released in 1996 | Emerged around 2009 |
Data model | Relational | Relational | Relational | Flexible (Document, Key-Value, Columnar, Graph, etc.) |
Primary language | SQL | SQL | SQL | Varies based on the specific NoSQL database |
ACID compliance | Supports ACID properties | Supports ACID properties | Supports ACID properties | Varies depending on the specific NoSQL database |
Schema | Requires predefined schema | Predefined schema (can emulate schema-less) | Predefined schema or flexible schema (can emulate schema-less) | Schema-less or flexible schema |
Querying | Supports SQL queries with join, aggregate, and filtering capabilities. | Supports SQL queries. | Supports SQL queries with advanced querying capabilities. | Querying capabilities vary depending on the specific database and its data model. |
Scalability | Can scale vertically and horizontally, but horizontal scaling can be challenging for some SQL databases. | Can scale vertically (horizontal scaling/sharding is possible, but difficult). | Can scale vertically (horizontal scaling/sharding is possible and third-party extensions address this). | Designed for horizontal scalability and supports vertical scalability. |
Use cases | Ideal for structured data and complex querying, suitable for a wide range of applications such as e-commerce, analytics, and content management systems. | Widely used in web apps, content management systems. | Well-suited for both simple and complex applications, data warehousing, content management systems, financial apps, web apps, geospatial data, and analytical use cases. | Suitable for handling unstructured, evolving, or high-velocity data. Used in IoT applications and content caching. |
The table below provides a very concise (and basic) summary comparing MySQL and PostgreSQL:
Comparison | MySQL | PostgreSQL |
---|---|---|
Pronunciation | “my-ess-queue-el” | “post-gres-queue-el” |
Data model | Relational | Relational / Object-relational |
Process model | Single process | Multiprocess |
Licensing | Dual-licensing model (commercial and open source editions) | Open Source |
Development | Owned by Oracle Corporation | Developed and maintained by the PostgreSQL Global Development Group |
Performance | Read performance | Balanced high read/write performance |
Indexing | B-tree, hash, full-text indexes | B-tree, hash, full-text, spatial indexes, GiST, SP-GiST, GIN, and BRIN |
Supported data types | Numeric, date/time, character, spatial, JSON | Numeric, date/time, character, boolean, enumerated, geometric, network address, JSON, XML, HSTORE, arrays, ranges, composite |
Replication | Master-slave replication, Group replication | Asynchronous and synchronous streaming replication |
JSON support | Basic support | Advanced support with JSONB data type |
Full-text search | Supported (limited) | Fully supported |
ACID compliance | ACID-compliant (only when used with InnoDB and NDB cluster engines) | Always ACID-compliant |
Supported languages | C/C++, Delphi, Erlang, Go, Java, Lisp, Node.js, Perl, PHP, R | C/ C++, Delphi, Erlang, Go, Java, Javascript, JSON, Lisp, .NET, Perl, PHP, Python, R, Tcl, others… |
Triggers | Supported (limited) | Fully supported |
To sum up, whether you need structured data management, scalability, advanced querying, or flexibility for unstructured data, there is a suitable database option available.
SQL and NoSQL databases each have their own strengths and best-fit scenarios. SQL databases like MySQL and PostgreSQL are great for organized, structured data in applications like e-commerce platforms, content management systems, and analytics systems. They ensure data integrity, support transactions, and offer advanced query capabilities. While MySQL is known for its simplicity, PostgreSQL adds advanced features, versatility, and flexibility to projects.
On the other hand, NoSQL databases are good at handling unstructured or semi-structured data - which works well for real-time analytics and IoT applications. These databases however, sacrifice some traditional transaction guarantees and have limited querying capabilities compared to SQL databases, such as PostgreSQL.
If you’re seeking the best of both worlds, PostgreSQL emerges as the right choice. It blends the reliability, transaction support, and advanced querying of SQL databases with the flexibility to handle unstructured or semi-structured data. PostgreSQL offers an array of features, support for various data types, and a very active community that is continuously contributing to its development and improvement. Developers can harness PostgreSQL's scalability, security, and comprehensive feature set to build high-performance and future-proof apps.
Want to add to the database discussion? Reach out to us on Discord or follow us on Twitter. We'd love to hear your thoughts, answer your questions, and keep you updated on the latest at Xata.
Join our community of subscribers to stay up to date with the latest news, tips and thought leadership, delivered directly to your inbox.